2015 No. 596

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND

The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

GPDO 2015 Part 6 & 7  are relevant to forestry


Planning controls over forestry are fairly simple on the face of it. Planning permission is not required for forestry work (except where there is a Tree Preservation Order) and may not be needed for buildings or uses of land necessary for forestry. However, planning permission is always required for non-forestry uses of land, buildings or any other form of development.

Sheds, workshops and tracks

A range of forest buildings can be erected without normal planning permission. This includes the erection, extension or alteration of a forestry building, such as a tool shed, store, office or shelter, or putting in a “private way” (access track). This is called Permitted Development (PD) and details are contained in Part 7 (Forestry Buildings and Operations) of the General Permitted Development Order 1995 (GPDO). Any building or track must be used for the purposes of forestry and not, for example, primarily for leisure or educational activities. Unlike agricultural PD rights (Part 6), there are no restrictions on the size of the forestry building, no requirement that the forestry must be run as a trade or business (so hobby forestry is OK as long as it is forestry) and no stipulation that it must relate to forestry operations only on that unit. Full PD rights also apply to any size of forestry holding, whereas, for agriculture, there are reduced PD rights for holdings less than 5 hectares. A small anomaly is that osier growing counts as agriculture and therefore the two tier agricultural PD system applies, with less generous PD rights for holdings smaller than 5 hectares.

To qualify as Permitted Development, a building that is erected cannot be used as a dwelling, cannot be within 25 metres of a classified road, and must be “reasonably necessary” for the purposes of forestry. Also, any building must be designed for the purpose for which it is


Planning legislation and small woodlands

Lucy Nichol offers a basic guide to the law relating to forestry buildings and other woodland development.

Woodland Development: Clissett Wood’s workshop and kitchen. Reproduced from the book Living Wood by Mike Abbott.

intended, so a forestry hut that looks like a house, or even is capable of providing overnight shelter, is not allowed as PD.

A condition of Permitted Development rights for forestry is that you must give advance notice to the local planning authority of what you intend to do. This system is called the Prior Notification Procedure (or the Determination Procedure) and involves filling in a simple form and providing a map and drawing. The planners then have 28 days in which to notify you that your develop- ment should not begin without their prior approval of the siting, design and external appearance. At this point they could also reject the proposal as not “reasonably necessary” for the purposes of forestry.



Planning controls over forestry are fairly simple on the face of it. Planning permission is not required for forestry work (except where there is a Tree Preservation Order) and may not be needed for buildings or uses of land necessary for forestry. However, planning permission is always required for non-forestry uses of land, buildings or any other form of development.

Sheds, workshops and tracks

A range of forest buildings can be erected without normal planning permission. This includes the erection, extension or alteration of a forestry building, such as a tool shed, store, office or shelter, or putting in a “private way” (access track). This is called Permitted Development (PD) and details are contained in Part 7 (Forestry Buildings and Operations) of the General Permitted Development Order 1995 (GPDO). Any building or track must be used for the purposes of forestry and not, for example, primarily for leisure or educational activities. Unlike agricultural PD rights (Part 6), there are no restrictions on the size of the forestry building, no requirement that the forestry must be run as a trade or business (so hobby forestry is OK as long as it is forestry) and no stipulation that it must relate to forestry operations only on that unit. Full PD rights also apply to any size of forestry holding, whereas, for agriculture, there are reduced PD rights for holdings less than 5 hectares. A small anomaly is that osier growing counts as agriculture and therefore the two tier agricultural PD system applies, with less generous PD rights for holdings smaller than 5 hectares.

To qualify as Permitted Development, a building that is erected cannot be used as a dwelling, cannot be within 25 metres of a classified road, and must be “reasonably necessary” for the purposes of forestry. Also, any building must be designed for the purpose for which it is



A precedent set by the planning appeal, T/APP/V2255/A/97/286193/P7, provides a useful guide to what can be erected in a woodland setting. In this case, the Inspector allowed a 6 by 18 metre wooden building for the storage of equipment, as a workspace for producing fence posts, and as an office with washroom facilities, all of which was deemed necessary for managing a 21 hectare coppice woodland in Kent.

Using a caravan for forestry purposes, such as storage, shelter for workers or as an office, is another matter. Provided the caravan is not for residential use, it falls completely outside planning controls, and you do not need to ask the planning authority in advance. According to the Caravan Sites Act 1968, the legal definition of a caravan includes mobile homes and self-built structures. Under this definition, there is no necessity for the caravan to have wheels, as long as it is under the size limit (60 feet long, 20 feet wide and 10 feet high), can be delivered in no more than two sections by lorry, and is capable of being moved in one piece along a road when assembled.

Residential use

You will not be surprised to hear that it is extremely unusual to get planning permission for a dwelling in a wood. There have been a few successful cases, for instance involving charcoal burners in West Sussex and Hertfordshire, where a full-time forester has been allowed to build a cabin or site a caravan. In such cases, there are stringent tests of business viability and functional need applied to an enterprise, so if you are managing your woodland for primarily recreational or conservation reasons, permission would almost certainly be denied.

Any building used as a dwelling requires planning permission. Even a structure which is not a building but is used for residential purposes requires permission (the planning system controls not only the erection of buildings, but also any change of use of land and buildings). For this reason, a vehicle, caravan, railway carriage, yurt or any form of temporary structure in which a person is living requires planning permission, wheels or no wheels.


However, there is an allowance for forestry workers to live in caravans in woods during a particular season while carrying our forestry work (see Part 5 of the General Permitted Development Order 1995). The forestry worker must use a caravan that fits the legal definition (see above) but there is no clear ruling on how long a season can go on for; in 1993, the High Court merely concluded that a season is “less than a year”!

Part 4 of the GPDO may be of interest to those not working in forestry but wanting occasionally to stay overnight in their woodland. According to this section, on a holding exceeding 5 acres, up to three caravans can be stationed for human habitation at any one time, provided that the site is not used for this purpose for more than 28 days in a year.

Crafts and processing of wood

The processing and finishing of wood is a grey area within planning law. There is no relevant definition of forestry in the Planning Acts, so it is unclear whether activities such as charcoal burning, greenwood turnery, planking or mushroom cultivation are to be regarded as ancillary uses to forestry, or as a material change of use.

On a very small scale, processing activities will be considered de minimis (trifling or legally insignificant). However, above this level, processing is more legally problematic. In 1986, a Judge found that converting trees to hewn poles or logs was “forestry”, but that planing, shaping or sawing logs into specified dimensions was “carpentry”. This tough line has been mirrored in cases of log-sawing, the manufacture of fire-lighters and making charcoal. However, an important precedent was set in 2000 (Millington v Secretary of State for Environment). In this case, a Judge found that processing which is “reasonably necessary to make the products marketable or disposable for profit (in this case making wine into grapes) was an ancillary use to growing the raw material & would therefore not need permission.

Whatever your intention in a woodland, it is important that before embarking on any development you seek planning advice, liaise with the planning local planning authority and read up on the relevant literature. 


This article is intended as a general guide only on the circumstances of individual situations may mean that specific restrictions apply


 MY PLANNING DISPUTE OVER 

SITING OF CARAVAN

The planning officer was adamant that the caravan should be removed. His first gambit was that 

i was storing a caravan 0n the site & this was illegal & ordered immediate removal.

I pointed out it was legal & he asked me to complete a form as a complaint had been made. 

On receipt of the form again he said it did not meet the regulations & gave me 2 months to move it. 

He also implied that i had to prove my case & should seek legal advice if i was not happy with his 

ruling.

At this point i sent him the following letter


Dear Mr. Murphy,

Thank you for your observations, I am pleased that we have now agreed to concur.

 The caravan serves no purpose other than for use as a store or shelter for forestry

& Therefore can legally remain, as it is not subject to planning regulations.

 

Further to your advice,

I have been in email contact with the highly regarded Dr Lucy Murfett (nee Nichol) who was formally a member of the department of planning at Oxford Brookes University & is now the planning officer for Chiltern area of outstanding natural beauty. I will be referring to her advice & published paper later.

Also I have email corresponded with Simon Fairlie who has collaborated with Mrs. Murfett (Nichol) on her paper. He is responsible for the land magazine

Amanda Calvert of the Small woods association has spent a lot of time on this & has been an important contributor in obtaining & correlating this information.

I am sure you will agree that these people can be considered as experts in this field.

 

This is a precedent in planning for forestry, The most high level example being designer Kevin Mccloud who on a channel 4 series built a hut on wheels buried in the ground & was therefor considered a caravan for shelter & as such was not subject to the regulations.

 
 

DEFINITION OF FORESTRY

 

In Section 336 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, there is nostatutorydefinition of forestry anywhere in planning law — so whether you are pruning a tree, making charcoal, or any other form of management, you are carrying out “forestry” — it is, as lawyers say whenever they are not sure about anything “a matter of fact and degree”.

 

I have the right to keep a caravan on my land, providing it is used solely for forestry, for example as tool storage, office or forestry worker’s restroom, which after filling in the planning contravention notice we have agreed this is its use.

A caravan is not a structure under the forestry regulations, but is equipment necessary to carry out forestry, as is a tree chipper, log slitter, or timber trailer.

 

 

Planning permission is not required for forestry work (except where there is a Tree Preservation Order)

If the caravan is only being used for forestry,

Then there is no change of use

So there is no development

& As such the regulations are not applicable

 

As Dr Murfett (Nichol) states

 

Using a caravan for forestry purposes, such as storage, shelter for workers or as an office, is another matter. Provided the caravan is not for residential use, it falls completely outside planning controls, and you do not need to ask the planning authority in advance. According to the Caravan Sites Act 1968, the legal definition of a caravan includes mobile homes and self-built structures. Under this definition, there is no necessity for the caravan to have wheels, as long as it is under the size limit (60 feet long, 20 feet wide and 10 feet high), can be delivered in no more than two sections by lorry, and is capable of being moved in one piece along a road when assembled.

 

https://smallwoods.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/planning.pdf

 

This is the legal situation.

As Stated by one of the most eminent & highly qualified planning officer in the

UK.

 

I refer you to the to the court judgment 

Wealden DC v SoS and Colin Day, 7/12/87

which ruled that the use of a caravan as a place to mix feed, a farm office and a shelter for agricultural workers did not constitute a change of use on an agricultural holding.

The same would apply to caravans used exclusively for forestry storage. 

 

 

So in conclusion My Forestry Store / shelter, is legal & will remain.

 

I thank you for your assistance in this matter & will be contacting you in the future about a permitted development to replace it

 

Regards

 

John Morris




RESOLUTION

At this point the planners conceded, & there was no further correspondence on the matter of the caravan. 

N.B  

The Wealden judgment is, 

on the face of it, authority for the proposition that a caravan used purely for agricultural storage is not a building (by virtue of its being mobile, at least in theory), and provided its use is purely ancillary to the agricultural use of the land its stationing on the land does not constitute a material change of use.

However, the “Woolley Chickens” case would appear to throw doubt on this proposition. 

 Wealden has never been over-ruled  so has precedent & is still good law.

A similar problem arises in relation to a residential caravan, where the “Woolley Chickens” case would now appear to throw some doubt on the earlier judgment in Guildford RDC v Fortescue in 1959 and the Measor judgment of 1998.I fear that the current uncertainty will continue until the High Court is called upon to address this precise point, and to say definitely whether those earlier judgments have now been overtaken by the “Woolley Chickens” case, 

or whether this later case may perhaps have gone too far, so that Guildford, Measor and also Wealden are still good law.




 

 

 

 


PERMITTED DEVEOPMENT WARNING

Permitted development in woodland is not what it seems, 

Before you commence any work you have to contact the planning officer who will require, 

A set of plans including foundations,
The materials to be used & colours,
A fee     (as of 2019 Bromsgrove require £96.00)

At this point they have 28 days to respond & can refuse your application, to proceed you either have to comply with there requirements or take legal action.

If you have already started or built a structure , it is possible to apply for retrospective planning permission  (the fee is different)

So in conclusion permitted development 

in woodland still needs the planners 

permission. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!






 

Make a free website with Yola